You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
60 lines
2.7 KiB
60 lines
2.7 KiB
|
|
==================================================
|
|
🚀 测试案例: 用户产前报告（应当无质量问题）
|
|
==================================================
|
|
DEBUG: Running Rule Engine...
|
|
DEBUG: Fetching RAG Context...
|
|
DEBUG: Performing similarity search...
|
|
DEBUG: Starting LLM Analysis...
|
|
|
|
【质控分析结果】:
|
|
--------------------
|
|
### 超声报告质控分析报告
|
|
|
|
#### 🤖 AI 智能深度分析：
|
|
该报告未发现质量问题
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
==================================================
|
|
🚀 测试案例: 错误报告（应当发现性别冲突）
|
|
==================================================
|
|
DEBUG: Running Rule Engine...
|
|
DEBUG: Fetching RAG Context...
|
|
DEBUG: Performing similarity search...
|
|
DEBUG: Starting LLM Analysis...
|
|
|
|
【质控分析结果】:
|
|
--------------------
|
|
### 超声报告质控分析报告
|
|
|
|
#### ⚠️ 自动规则检测（高可靠）：
|
|
- 【严重】性别与部位冲突：患者性别为男，但在报告描述中出现了'子宫'。
|
|
|
|
#### 🤖 AI 智能深度分析：
|
|
扣分理由：
|
|
1. 性别与检查部位严重冲突：患者性别为"男"，但检查部位为"子宫"，男性不存在子宫，属于解剖逻辑错误。
|
|
2. 胎儿双顶径单位错误：双顶径90mm明显过大（正常妊娠晚期双顶径约90-100mm），应为9.0mm或单位应为cm。
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
"score": 30,
|
|
"issues": [
|
|
{
|
|
"original": "患者性别: 男\n检查部位: 子宫",
|
|
"reason": "男性不存在子宫，解剖逻辑严重冲突",
|
|
"suggestion": "确认患者性别或检查部位是否正确",
|
|
"type": "解剖逻辑错误"
|
|
},
|
|
{
|
|
"original": "双顶径 90mm",
|
|
"reason": "单位错误，90mm的胎儿双顶径不符合临床实际",
|
|
"suggestion": "应为9.0mm或单位改为cm",
|
|
"type": "单位错误"
|
|
}
|
|
],
|
|
"corrected_fields": {
|
|
"患者性别": "需确认",
|
|
"检查部位": "需确认",
|
|
"双顶径": "9.0mm 或 9.0cm"
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|